The neo-liberal dogma of the West has brought social values into the limelight thanks to the remarkable financial growth in East asian nations, which was achieved under various modalities. These are commonly called” Eastern principles”: discipline, hard work, thrift, educational progress, the importance of home, balancing individual and societal needs, and deference to authority. Some spectators claim that these Asiatic principles are responsible for East Asia’s remarkable economic growth rates and organized political frameworks.

Yet, this discussion is essentially an internal one. The traditions and traditions that underpin the development of modern East Asia are rooted in these traditions. Numerous of these principles derive from Confucian convention, which views the relatives as the fundamental cultural device within which all other interactions form.

These principles affect how government functions, how it is organized, and how social contribution is conducted. Additionally, they have an impact on the nature of the financial relationship between East Asia and the West. In a 1994 beliefs ballot, “accountability of public officials through empty votes” was ranked among the highest critical principles by both American and East Asian respondents. These results suggest that Asian ideals are more in line with South Asian standard cultures than a dismissal of Western liberal politics.

This article aims to deliver insights into what these Asian values mean and how they relate to eudaimonic well-being. In particular, it is believed that those who support higher levels of Asiatic values and are exposed to high levels of cultural stress will be able to use their own cultural coping strategies to counteract racism, buffering the damaging effects of this cultural discrimination on emotional well-being.